Technology
The way people communicate with each other has recently changed because of development in different technological aspects.
One of the specific inventions which has significantly changed our if is mobile phones. Thanks to the existence of these smart devices, people interaction in society have become faster and so easier. However, it has affected our life both positively and negatively. One of the advantages of mobile phones is that access to people is more convenient. It has made considerable progress in jobs and academic environments, moreover it has resulted in a revolution in the world of communication. Using phones and various applications on them help us to do some tasks remotely and on time, instead of physical presence at places like Banks or shops. Internet shopping is another clear example of new technological developments. Phones, our Laptops or PCs, and online managed servicing play important rolls about this type of shopping and business.
On the other hand, there are some negative points about using these technologies. One of the disadvantages of cell phones is an addiction to them. If we cannot control utilizing these facilities, we will addict to them, so it will consequently affect our interaction with people around us like family members and friends. Each person learns lots of social behaviours through interacting with people and not in virtual worlds and webs on the internet. Another negative of new technologies is its influence on children. For instance, if they can not limit their playing time with gadgets and video games, they will not learn the social skill of a friendly and beneficial connection with the other children.
In short, I believe that technology has substantially changed our life and our interaction with other people. Although I think that its positive points outweigh the negative effects if we can use it correctly and based on the requirements.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2671009772 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99888041582 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583061889251 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5270909559 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1176470588 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137552142088 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549081447664 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100574857056 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117168584162 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562789307243 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.