In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in such a way
why is this, and it is a positive or negative development?
In this contemporary era, businesses has to work much harder to bring innovations to their products in order to survive this competitive world. Recently, they are advertising that their commodities are special, compared to their rivals. I am convinced, this radical development will be good for the people, while companies also enjoying the benefits. This essay intends to discuss the reasons as well as the profits of this development with examples and supporting points.
To begin with, product sales of any multi-million dollar businesses rely on their attractive adverts. Advertisements are long believed to persuade people in buying things, which are not of any use to them. When people began to realize, how they were exploited by corporate companies and their good-looking advertisements, these firms chanced their approach. From then on, businesses started to advertise cleverly, by incorporating new ideas into peoples’ mind. Thereby, emphasizing their products to have unique characters in comparison with their competitors, thus making them a successive entreprise.
On the other hand, these innovative businesses have the obvious advantage, both in terms of boosted economic growth and fair public image, people also benefit from them. When companies emphasise their products to be special and new in a particular way, their statement should be fool-proof. Furthermore, if their commodities were found to be wrongly advertised, they will have to face the hideous repurcussions. This creates more and more pressure on those firm, eventually leading to innovations, with newer better products being introduced periodically, which might be advantageous for the public.
To summarize, businesses planned on increasing their profits by emphasising unique things about their product, whereas their attitude towards selling their manufacutred goods unknowingly benefited the general public, with improved product standard.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 202, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...acutred goods unknowingly benefited the general public, with improved product standard.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, then, thus, well, whereas, while, as to, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81754385965 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07324357973 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635087719298 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5913557702 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372036946365 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131789970578 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758417724876 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240675857398 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446841935569 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.