There shall be benefits for society if all advertisement forms are completely banned.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

There shall be benefits for society if all advertisement forms are completely banned.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The total prohibition of advertising via whole media is advantageous for society. Unfortunately, I currently perceive this statement as falsity for some plausible reasons explained in this essay.
On the one hand, it is possible that advertisement would campaign on behalf of market share. In the market, when the company aimed to promote their product, the ideal way would be to publish advertisement. The reason is provided by the fact that by this way, consciousness of consumer-product quality among public can be fostered. Furthermore, it appears that advertising would be of crucial importance for society as a consumer. This is because to determine the quality of product could be revealed in broad comparison with others product. If the company did not advertise the items produced, there would be less probability for consumer to recognise a wide range of product.
Conversely, it might be said that some advertiser convey deceptive impression of their goods. Example could be seen on the consumers who encounter disappointed at their expectation about the product purchased when they judge absolute reliability of advertising. Nevertheless, in my perspective, it is injudicious to ban all forms of advertisement merely due to this disadvantage. There would be the effective way to minimise the negative impacts, in which government could formulate coherent policy on how advertisement can be published.
To conclude, in spite of its possible drawback, it seems advisable that advertising via whole media not be totally prohibited because this action is still beneficial for both the company and society as a consumer. Indeed, this is provided as there are policy and its adequate supervision on publishable advertisement.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45724907063 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28782616018 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576208178439 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2360503396 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177651325688 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703540197311 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04779550096 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108736466892 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026146786788 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.