‘The best way to educate children is by using the Internet in EVERY lesson.’ To what extent do you share this opinion ? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children?
It is believed that internet in education is the most acceptable method for teaching a whole range of subjects. I clearly perceive this as a truth for plausible excuses together with other effective methods, explained in this essay.
On the one hand, it would appear that via online database and search engines, students could streamline academic research in lesson. For instance, internet can virtually provide cross-geographical understanding in which only after downloading online podcast related, can children clearly envision the concept of particular field. Moreover, it seems that internet access would indirectly enhance young students to be critic of evaluating literary sources. To clarify, when discriminating between sources, more information should be sifted as resources are synthesised. On behalf of children’s study, this would establish credibility and self-study skill on referencing literary.
Conversely, it must be said that there are some negative contents available in internet, allowing young students to exposure violence on media and to curiously aim for pornographic images. Nevertheless, on my perspective, as long as there are adequate parental and school supervision when accessing internet, children would not suffer from those term of abuse, because guide learning is to supplement positive material.
Turning to the other effective methods in lesson, it would be to directly undertake field-monitoring visits. For example, to study about ancient artifact, visiting the archeological museum could build up actually visual image of relicts. In addition, the availability of school library for academic research would be another acceptable ways to educate students by autonomous learning, allowing students to sharpen self-study skills.
In conclusion, despite its negative influences, I strongly accept the internet to be the best way to expand literary references and master study skills. Indeed, there are other effective methods to consider, such as organizing educational visits and offering research library.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89932885906 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12847437597 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634228187919 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4593610059 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.571428571 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208200233096 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673779982095 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373574692153 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112973303361 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252690964195 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.