These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away.
What are the causes and problems?
Nowadays, most people tends to use things only in a short time and then throws it away easier in some nations. In this essay, I will examine the reasons why our society has changed in this way and also the negative effects from this situation.
Many possible causes of throw-away society can be identified. First, there are many substitution products with a low switching cost to buy a new thing. Due to a lower barrier to entry in some market, there is a high competition among players leading to a variety of products with a competitive price. As a result, consumers have more choices in buying and spend less time when they make a decision to buy new things for replacing the existing one. In addition, the technology and fashion have changed rapidly resulting in a fast growing in new product development appealing people to buy these new products. The advancement in technology can be used in inventing new products and knowhow which give a rise to better standard and new product features. Accordingly, it might be a good motivation for some people to purchase a new thing as it provides higher qualifications.
On the other hand, there are several impacts of being in a throw-away society. For one thing, the environmental problems from a short usage of goods can be occurred from a lack of waste disposal process. If people leave their belongings easily and it is out of control of the government, there are many rubbish spread out around our city. Moreover, the household debt may rise considerably than it should be. Since people has been motivated for spending in a new things despite their existing one is not worn out, they might have a new liability for purchasing these new things.
In conclusion, there are many causes contribute to a throw-away lifestyle of people in this recent year which in my opinion I think it is mainly a result of a low switching cost in having a new product. As for its effects, there are various negative impacts including the environmental problems and household’s debt issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... negative effects from this situation. Many possible causes of throw-away socie...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as it provides higher qualifications. On the other hand, there are several imp...
^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
...as been motivated for spending in a new things despite their existing one is not worn ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility for purchasing these new things. In conclusion, there are many causes con...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, as for, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, for one thing, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8452722063 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82972143876 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535816618911 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5683755963 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260659252721 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927108106391 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940451856946 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177315744349 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428399207637 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.