The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages.
It is often argued that nuclear weapons keep the world peace and that nuclear energy is an inexpensive and environmentally friendly source of power. This essay totally disagrees that these benefits outweigh the damaging potential of nuclear power.
First and foremost, nuclear energy is not as clean as it is considered, but . It produces more harmful pollutants than fossil fuels. Nuclear reactors work on fission process where uranium atoms are bombarded by slow electrons to produce energy. As a result of this reaction, a huge amount of heat is produced along with uranium waste remains which is are highly reactive and emits cancer-causing rays. For instance, according to the nuclear research association, if a nuclear waste produced from fission of five-gram uranium is disposed of in an open environment, it could can cause skin cancer to the whole population living in fifty-kilometer radius. Therefore, scientists are working to dump nuclear waste underground so that its harmful effects can be controlled.
Furhermore, the idea that nuclear fission is a clean source of energy has been dispelled by numerous tragic accidents at nuclear power stations. These disasters show just how harmful and long lasting a leak of nuclear material can be and the contamination is not worth it when other sources of energy are available. For example, the Fukushima disaster has polluted huge parts of the Pacific Ocean and it has been reported that fish as far away as California have dangerous levels of radiation. Therefore, solar and wind energy should replace nuclear energy tomorrow, for avoiding hazardous disasters in future.
In conclusion, this essay disagrees with the opinion that nuclear technology is beneficial rather than dangerous because the consequences of using nuclear energy in the wrong way are so catastrophic to both human and the Earth itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-17 | Azwar Fadillah Zulham | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | dkklinkkk | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-14 | hakobyan04.07 | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | JeanLin | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-15 | RajatSharma1 | 67 | view |
- Soem peole 11
- Do you agree or diagree It is better for children to choose jobs that are similiar to their parents job than to choose jobs which are very different from their parents jobs Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Integrated 3
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime. Some people suggest that the circumstances of a crime and the reason for committing it should be taken into consideration when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views 67
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT E-BOOKS AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY WILL TOTALLY REPLACE TRADITIONAL NEWSPAPER AND MAGAZINES. TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...is not as clean as it is considered, but . It produces more harmful pollutants tha...
^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing to the nuclear research association, if a nuclear waste produced from fission...
^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...orrow, for avoiding hazardous disasters in future. In conclusion, this essay disagrees...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3277027027 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86535745207 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7123732531 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316107837454 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12287017295 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854216916719 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20739285284 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066383285937 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.