Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that modern communication devices such as mobile phones and computers are becoming increasingly popular. While I accept that such devices play a vital role in many aspects of life, I also believe that face-to-face communication can be negatively impacted as a result of over-using these devices or using them in an improper way.
On the one hand, it is apparent that smartphones, tablets and computers can greatly facilitate the communication process. Firstly, the internet can provide a support platform to users in a broad range of areas. For example, in addition to traditional teaching methods, teachers can instruct their students through online lectures, streamed live via some applications such as Skype or Facebook. Secondly, cell phones and computers, like a bridge, can connect people from different countries without the need for them to travel across the world. In recent years, the popularity of social networking sites has made the establishment of personal or business relationships easier and more convenient.
On the other hand, portable phones and computers cause a breakdown of physical communication among people. The first reason is that such devices are highly addictive, and they draw much of the users’ attention, so they will spend less time talking directly with their friends or relatives. Many adolescents, for instance, sit with or near each others, but they only concentrate on surfing the Web, typing Facebook comments, or chatting with others via Zalo, Skype, and other apps. Another reason is that users of such devices are into the virtual world of the internet and distracted from the real world very often. As a result, they can chat or share stories via online social networks, but they have inadequate confidence when they attempt a real face-to-face conversation.
In conclusion, life has become more convenient thanks to high-tech communication tools, but I firmly believe that technology has lead to a decrease in traditional face-to-face communication among people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an improper way" with adverb for "improper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... over-using these devices or using them in an improper way. On the one hand, it is apparent tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39308176101 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9941483349 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59748427673 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2793063244 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7692307692 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1727468228 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569981019569 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577949425577 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118345854362 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550544068824 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.