Today the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and suggest solutions.
Some people believe that urban dwellers do not enjoy good quality of life. Anecdotal evidence shows that city life is stressful to mankind and depression is rampant in the overcrowded cities.
The most prominent reason behind this is that interaction among the urban people is on the fall. They often fail to communicate effectively with their neighbors and friends, which in turn creates a sense of insecurity among individuals. Each and every person is living in their own isolated virtual world, unable to share their feelings and emotions or exude empathy towards each other, creating far reaching repercussions. For instance, children dwelling in cities are prone to depression, when compared to village children. Hence it is clear that the rampant lack of communication among people in overcrowded cities is the rudimentary reason behind the decrease in quality of their life. Urban dwellers also have to cope with several other issues like pollution, traffic congestion and higher cost of living. Pollution increases their risk of developing various illnesses and even reduces their longevity.
There are several solutions to this problem. Making urban areas less congested by improving employment opportunities in rural areas is one of them. It is also important to improve interaction between people. Regular social occasions, events or games can be arranged by the like-minded groups to encourage people to socialize. Such platforms must be made available to the public so that they can share their feelings and engage in teamwork. Thus they can reduce the stress of city life and improve its quality.
To sum up, even though modern facilities are readily available in urban regions, quality and moral standards of life are deteriorating rapidly due to a variety of reasons. However, these problems can be solved to a great extent if the government and the residents take concerted action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ion, when compared to village children. Hence it is clear that the rampant lack of co...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... their feelings and engage in teamwork. Thus they can reduce the stress of city life...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32119205298 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76153580395 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4339556828 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5294117647 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105353161233 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349251549017 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502849459222 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772319516459 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045648713472 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.