Employers should give their workers at least one month holiday a year as it makes them to do better at their job.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is commonly believed that in order to improve work efficiency, employees should be given one month break from work. In my opinion, while I believe that getting off from work is important for everyone, there are several positions in many organizations for which one month break is not possible. In these cases, staffs should be given another means to relax.
One of the primary reasons for getting leave from work is to improve productivity. It is natural that people cannot work throughout the year without any break. In contrast, by taking a vacation, they feel refreshed and get a change from their monotonous work life. This, in turn, helps them to concentrate and do better when they come back on duty. This is even confirmed in a recent survey by Harvard business school where those participants who took regular breaks from their work were observed more productive than their counterparts. Thus, it is beneficial to take some time off the work.
However, in most of the organizations, there are people who are playing specific roles and cannot take a continuous break from the work. Take, for example, quality control head of a furniture manufacturing company, he has to remain on site during the production hours. If he is on leave and quality is compromised, then the company has to bear a heavy loss. Therefore, people in such positions cannot afford to take a long vacation. In such cases, these people should be given chance to take a small break for which cost would be bared by the company. They should be sent on small company-sponsored trips to popular destinations.
In conclusion, although it is important for employees to take breaks from their work in order to increase their performance, people playing certain roles cannot afford a long vacation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9397993311 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77454936558 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0594816896 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101118669206 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362308838357 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340451514396 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706331201124 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351761899764 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.