The quality of life in large cities is decreasing. What would be the reasons behind this? What measures can be taken to resolve this problem?
It is believed by many people that in metro cities standard of living is getting declined. There are many reasons such as traffic congestion and lack of person communication which are crucial factor behind this degradation. However, there are possible solutions which can help to restore the quality of life of city dwellers.
One of the pressing problems of mega cities is traffic Jam. This is because present public transport system is inadequate to serve the increasing population in these places. As a result people often got stuck in traffic congestion. As per recent survey of Mumbai city, more than 67% of people travel by public transport and spend approximately 3 hours for commuting between office and their home. However, this issue can be solved by improving the capacity of existing transport system and introduction of new one. For example, in Japan, after the introduction of underground metro, no more issue of traffic jam is observed.
Another related issue is lack of communication among people. Majority of people do not get time to talk to their neighbours and relatives due to lack of time. More often than not, they are running to complete their to-do list of every day and do not get time to share their feelings and emotions with others. As a result, they are often feel isolated. This issue can be resolved by arranging the social gatherings during weekends. Platforms where information about such events should be built and made available. This will aid people to come closer which in turn improve their quality of life.
In conclusion, due to the fast life of city dwellers, issues such as lack of personal time and reduced personal communication is diminishing their quality of life, but by building public transportation system they can be solved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... increasing population in these places. As a result people often got stuck in traf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03378378378 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71257487534 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7883140963 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6470588235 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214092683076 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700310637795 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729435998168 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138544696123 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259631512574 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.