One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in a number of people believing that workers should get one month relaxation to improve their productivity while others oppose it by saying that it may bring some negative consequences. I believe that first view is more effective and powerful to increase their efficiency at workplace. This essay would discuss both views in following paragraphs.
To commence with, there are deluge of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that one month holiday will work as an energy dose which will boost their confidence and concentration because when employees work continuously without any break of some time then it creates massive work pressure. It can not only contribute to bring innovative ideas, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to wide range of advantages that one month break offers, workers can enhance the quality of their performance with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand in one good stead as far as agumenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of aforementioned propositions is that it is only likely to help one excel and thrive in varied areas. Besides, employees will be more happier to work with company which can control the retrational rate of a company. For instance, the study results published by the government of Australia clearly indicate that 70% people joined those companies which offered them long breaks. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of this view point.
On the other hand, some sections of the society contradict the above-mentioned views by providing some justification. They reckon that 30 days break may lose their connectivity with work as they will be away from their job responsibilities will widen the gab between employees and their work. Therefore, they are not in favour to provide long break from work.
To conclude, having ponderd over above stated it is crystal clear that benefits of providing break of a month is indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deluges'?
Suggestion: deluges
...aragraphs. To commence with, there are deluge of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
...aried areas. Besides, employees will be more happier to work with company which can control...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more happier to work with company which can control the retrational rate of a co...
^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be away from their job responsibilities will widen the gab between employees and...
^^
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een employees and their work. Therefore, they are not in favour to provide long b...
^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lear that benefits of providing break of a month is indeed too great to ignore.
^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... benefits of providing break of a month is indeed too great to ignore.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08908045977 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80879155769 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5613604858 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6875 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168421638875 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460475722972 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523887389889 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850139402501 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558639474696 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.