In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are many debates that revolve around job requirements. Some people believe that practical skills are more essential than theories, and formal qualifications will be less important in the future. In my opinion, I am partly agree with this.
As the world is becoming more and more modern, the essential of practical skills is undeniable. The effectiveness of jobs mostly comes from realistic skills. A job applicant with good practical skills can keep up with the rate of job and complete his tasks faster than which lead to the job's effectiveness. On the other hand, qualifications only prove applicants who good at gaining knowledge from books but it does not show all his abilities. For example, some people have high scores at university but do not know how to behave to their customer while some can gratify their buyer despite of average marks.
However, in other aspects, theoretical knowledge are more important. There are jobs that theories are an indispensable base. A doctor cannot save his patients if he does not know anything about the human's body. As a result, theoretical knowledge are still need for job applicants. Moreover, qualifications may not show all one's capabilities but it can show patience, hard-working and effort that he has to get these.
To sum up, I could say that both practical skills and theories are essential and job seekers still need formal qualifications
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... the future. In my opinion, I am partly agree with this. As the world is becoming ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...his tasks faster than which lead to the jobs effectiveness. On the other hand, quali...
^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...result, theoretical knowledge are still need for job applicants. Moreover, qualifica...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, as to, for example, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09956709957 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91323015148 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601731601732 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3485860545 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1428571429 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286225000821 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927022012508 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656207451615 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173938147276 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327525263581 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.