In this knowledge-oriented society, top priority has been given to higher education due to its significance in individual growth and social progress. Under this circumstance, an absolute consensus can hardly be reached whether students with high marks or those did not do well in the school are qualified for the entrance to the university. I will make an objective analysis of this argument in my following essay。
Some people harbour the belief that best students by all means should have the qualification to enter the university on the grounds that they make much more efforts than other peers in the schooling. These top players will gain a stronger sense of self-motivation to reach a higher goal in the years to come and also set a good example for other students.
However, others maintain that students who do not achieve better scores but have wonderful performance in overall development or specialise in one specific field. After all, higher education does not solely focus on a few straight-A students. Instead, universities should recruit comprehensive talents rather than bookworms who concentrate on academic knowledge alone. Undoubtedly, the former are the backbone required by contemporary society.
From my own perspective, I side with the stance of the latter to a larger extent, believing that superior performance in academic study must be a crucial factor to evaluate the qualification of a student who can enter the university, but more all-round standards should be adopted. This is because the university is the place which can provide high-quality talents for the society. Apart from high scores, other qualities such as teamwork spirit, interpersonal skills, organizing ability and speciality in one field are of equal importance in enrollment standards.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, after all, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39145907473 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10045505039 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7316074886 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.727272727 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17750264035 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551921342334 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457307842644 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101016987969 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315700505804 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.