Topic: In some countries, young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard on their studies. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest?
In many countries nowadays, it is noticeable that teenagers have little or no time for entertainment and they also suffer from a lot of pressure with their studies.
This particular problem results from the teenagers themselves. In light of the modern and complex world, young people feel the need to gain more knowledge. As a result, they want to spend more time on studying to meet the requirement of the society. This will lead to insufficient time for entertainment. An obvious answer is for teenagers to grasp the essence of leisure time. It is clear that a person cannot study effectively with a bad medical condition, and proper time for entertainment can guarantee a good health for young people. Moreover, leisure time is beneficial for studying and gaining knowledge as well, for learning can be more efficient when the mind do not need to work hard. For example, gravity was invented when Newton was sitting under an apple tree. The scientist just enjoyed his time and an apple hitting his head made him create a marvelous theory.
Another reason for the mentioned problem is pressure from the teenagers’ families. Parents of young people think it is important for their children to spend most of their time learning, as it can assure a good job in the future. A good idea is for parents to understand that free time is as imperative as study time. Furthermore, they should try to help their sons or daughters find a way to balance their time for studies and for entertainment. This will lead to the obvious improvement of their efficiency and production.
To conclude, study and entertainment are both extremely essential for everyone, especially teenagers. It is enormously imperative for them to make good use of study time and leisure time in order to achieve as much as possible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, so, well, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92131147541 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85877574562 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527868852459 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9368434384 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2941176471 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184095075623 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066555769241 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046297183806 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124790280251 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436231339288 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.