Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages?
In today’s today advanced society, there are arguement associated with notion’s growth whether or not its thrive country can trigger the disappearance of social principles. In this regards, this essay agree in disadvantage due to the fact that resident’s effort in the work and the cupidity in every single individuals.
It is evindently reasonable to argue that the social welfare are one of the most out standing point in the field of benefit. When the authorities stimulate the development by financial, citizens who would enjoy more their life via having a numberous of entertainmnet. Moreover, the effect of vehicle, labour, family, insurances,.. are incredibly increasing, which give people a birghter future. For example, the elders no need to pay for the nursing home fee since the goverment all see to that. Hence, the old residents are not become a burden and do not have to depend on their children’s money.
Nevertheless, every coins have 2 sides, either this problem which has plenty of drawback . A significant factor which should be taken into account is the hectic workload’s quantity of employees. It is clearly seen that it is not having a time being with the family and their acquaintance, even could not set aside time for themself. Dwellers are going to gain a lot of advantage from social welfare however, they had to be diligent 10 to 12 hours work per days, which bring them a sense of extremely exhausted and might have several diseases both mentally and physically. Another obviously justification is that the worst personality of each individuals which is the greed and envy will be put on top. If plenty of company has the cupidity problem, it might exert an influnece on that company and even on that nations so that it will go on strike the elaboration of whole country.
From what has been declared above, I am convinced that in spite of the plus point of social welfare, people who are responsible for a lot of tasks and the deeply greed. By having said that the government should think clearly in order to solve this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...nt associated with notion's growth whether or not its thrive country can trigger the disa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... disappearance of social principles. In this regards, this essay agree in disadvanta...
^^^^
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...t of vehicle, labour, family, insurances,.. are incredibly increasing, which give ...
^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... of vehicle, labour, family, insurances,.. are incredibly increasing, which give p...
^^
Line 2, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
... vehicle, labour, family, insurances,.. are incredibly increasing, which give peopl...
^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...his problem which has plenty of drawback . A significant factor which should be ta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96571428571 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9377295016 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6172510543 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0603465728174 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0173294120522 0.084324248473 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0216213688563 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0381120482426 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120746108662 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.