The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years, and there are few places which are unaffected by it. However, tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As an increasing effect of globalism puts forth the question of tourism, we are being faced with more and more controversies. Central to these is the benefit of tourism in the first place, which, some argue, is seldom witnessed. Putting those reciprocal views to the test, however, one should analyze both the economical and cultural ramifications of the industry.
Admittedly, in monetary terms, the toursim industry has been marching very well. New small and medium sized enterprises have been established to meet the increasing demand of foreign visitors, and along with these came a lot of job opporunities in the field. Also, the influx of tourists provides a rich source for foreign currency, which is particularly precious for countries struggling with an unstable currency rate.
Nonetheless, those who question the utility of tourism emphasize on the meta-economic effect of such model. By this, I mean the state of dependency that arises from owing a significant ration of a country's growth to the externally-based tourism. They argue that an actual soveriegn polity would want to ensure that tourism only has a complementary economic role, lest it becomes weaponized upon a political dispute.
On the other hand, the cultural impact of tourism is no less controversial. Proponents of tourism tend to highlight the intermingle brought about by the industry. They claim that it allows for an exchange of ideas and a great deal of mutual tolerance. Nevertheless, given the general hedonist theme of modern tourism, this is probably not the case. In fact, when sophisticated cultures and civilizations become a subject of the perfunctory exhibitions of tourism, they seem to be commercialized and thus only shallowly presented.
On balance, even though basic economic parameters suggest great advantages of tourism, a more comprehensive scrutiny seems to tip the scales in favor of keeping it in check. In terms of culture, also, toursim only appears to be beneficial if seen through the lens of modernism, which begs the question of traditional identities and thereby might end up harming them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this came' or 'these cames'?
Suggestion: this came; these cames
...and of foreign visitors, and along with these came a lot of job opporunities in the field....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of jobs'.
Suggestion: a lot of jobs
...ign visitors, and along with these came a lot of job opporunities in the field. Also, the in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...Proponents of tourism tend to highlight the intermingle brought about by the industry. They cla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, well, i mean, in fact, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31343283582 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06514114203 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632835820896 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2718390676 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172678617528 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549392233548 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046032391664 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888695944187 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228591393253 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.