The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years, and there are few places which are affected by it. However, tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is true that in many parts of the world, tourism industry has been grown rapidly and affected most areas for the time being last half century. Nevertheless, some people belive that countries visited by tourists are less benefited by tourism businesses than it should be. This essay will discuss both side of aspects.
There are plethora of arguments in favour of tourism benefits to the regional people where they visit. To commence with, It is generally said that tourism has brought about significant employement opprtunities. Tourism, for example , can bring people to remote area and rural people may get job in hotel or drive tourits for site seeing. Secondly, It is widely belived that although new infrasturecture and facilities are established in order to convinience of the tourists, both tourists and local person would be benefited to advance faclilities. As a result, tourists and local people mutually stimulate and benefit each other.
Finally, It has been claimed that province individuals and tourists may learn more about each others customs and culture. Hence, there would be a greater understadnig and knowledege transfer.
The persuasive arguments against the tourism which rarely benefits the countries where tourists avial the trip. Firstly, some people point out that if tourists companies are foreign-owned, it would not provide sufficient money to local country since they may avial greater portion of money in their home country as commision or they could provide only sessional employments. What is more, It is suggested that when faclities to local region may give some benfits, improvements in local heritage and infrastructure may damage the natural environment. For instance, sea view hotels spoil the beauty of sea waves sometimes. Lastly, It is likely that tourists and guides may not respect each others culture owing to language barier.
To recapitulate, In spite of the reasons against tourism rarely profits destination country, it may have most benefits to the tourists place. Personally, I believe that tourism and associated individuals should be stimulated in order to uphold their economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ement opprtunities. Tourism, for example , can bring people to remote area and rur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, as for, for example, for instance, as a result, in spite of, it is true, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80923216555 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579104477612 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4586540786 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.411764706 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229416908748 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758308818576 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751616075548 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127032267069 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602469404807 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.