The tradition that family get together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts
Recently, it is a fact that gathered family meals are vanishing in the life of modern citizens and here are some reasons for this tendency and its affects on society.
To begin with, families are struggling to share food due to the chaotic lifestyle at job and in personal life as well. There is no denying of the high demands of employers such as staying at work longer and fulfill additional tasks, by sacrificing own time that could be spent for family dinners. Consequently, workers get even more stressed, as they lose a chance to share the meals with the closest ones at home furnishings. Moreover, the absence of a particular family member around the table lead to the deterioration of relationships and sometimes may cause the divorces of young families.
In addition, youngsters and young aged adults, occasionally, skip the eatings with family, as they may have meetings with the new acquaintances. Although, it is beneficial for the young people, who have to settle in the commnity with the wide range of friends, the relationships between them and their parents jeopardize in this case. Yet another reason, why the tradition of families getting together to eat meals is perishing is seemingly the traffic jam, which is becoming more common even in the countryside. The delays on the road way back home deprives people from having family time around the table and causes the high levels of stress and isolation, since there is no one left at the end of the day to share the mind with as well.
In conclusion, undoubtedly, the custom of people to have gathered meals is becoming less common, due to the certain reasons mentioned above and it affects negatively on families' relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | The Lazy Tiger | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | RyanHoang190398 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | hammy | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Shaibal das | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 84 | view |
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 84
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give y 84
- Public transportation is a great way to travel, particularly within a metropolis. The Shanghai metro is the most convenient way to get around the city. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, moreover, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90625 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78214717115 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.2365672655 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.3 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18000040492 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738300413443 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771540198451 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111209972492 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216272691521 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.