Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future, and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? What role should traditions have in our lives?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There is an argument that we need innovations to force the future of our world and old traditions should be removed. Although there are several traditions that in fact play a pivotal role in human lives, it is irrefutable that this world should be modernised with technological advancement.
It is undeniable that people do need traditions in their daily lives. Human is by nature social animal, so we have to socialise for our living. For that reason, culture and custom appear to be crucial to keep our society legitimated and unique. For example, the use of spoon and folk during the meal that varies due to the diversity of backgrounds.
However, to modernise the world, we need innovations. Simply put, our world has been developed and industrialised to suit people's routines. It is an uncontroversial fact that technology introduced the world with innovation and comfort. Mobile phones, for instance, have a pivotal role in one's life as a reliable assistant who reminds us when and where to be. Our entire world requires the advancement in technology to occur and make a change to benefit from.
To sum it all up, some people believe that old traditions should be removed and replaced with new inventions of the future. However, culture should be considered a crucial factor for humankind since it provides us with a space to be natural and to socialise. The technology is to be advanced to manipulate the world and it is crucial to develop modern-style innovation to fulfil our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s, for instance, have a pivotal role in ones life as a reliable assistant who remind...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96825396825 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92583592722 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543650793651 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8968464653 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227204667984 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851723033426 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583137553497 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154205776774 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565349150964 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.