The revolution and innovation of the university education is consistently concerned by many sections of society. A new opinion points out that colleges should enroll the equal numbers of students for both genders. This essay will address two reasons why this opinion should not be recommended.
The first reason is that this manner will produce an unfair educational environment for students. As well-known that one gender has its natural talents than the other in some specific areas, like schoolboys is better than schoolgirls in logic thinking, hence it is reasonable that more male learners study physic and more female learners devote to arts. If the schools is only pursuing the equal amounts of genders, some students might lose their opportunities to fulfill their dreams of studying in an ideal university. This is not an equitable treatment for those students who have a better academic qualification. Therefore, the universities should not require the exact same numbers of both genders in every courses.
Secondly, it is not beneficial for undergraduates and schools whilst some consequences will occur. The students who are accepted with unqualified capacities might encounter massive pressures amid their college life, which could become a nightmare for them. Meanwhile, mentors may have to repeat their teaching for these students due to their unconsolidated fundamental knowledge. As a result that the quality of education will also be effected, which could cause the dissatisfaction of the students and their parents. According to what mentioned, forcing the even quantity of genders is not helpful for both students and schools.
To conclude, the new viewpoint, pursuing the symmetry of the numbers of both genders in every courses, is not recommended because of the potential of creating an unfair teaching environment and the negative influences for both undergraduates and colleges.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... to fulfill their dreams of studying in a ideal university. This is not a equitab...
^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ying in a ideal university. This is not a equitable treatment for those students ...
^
Line 5, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... helpful for both students and schools. To conclude, the new viewpoint, pursuing...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47796610169 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99524472304 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569491525424 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.339681821 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167460527365 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587560062229 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503972855487 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995348029626 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356377858605 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.