Some opines that the number of students a university can take should be equal in gender. I do not agree with that for some reasons.
To begin with, keeping same number for both gender will be worse practice for a university. To illustrate, the subject will not be chosen by gender and due to this some seats will remain black for specific gender. As a consequence of this, university will face difficulties to maintain the seats of each subject, and they will not get fees of these unused fees. Furthermore, some students have to change their university because of lacking of seat. For example, provided that in the Biology, authority will take fifty male and female students. If the places of woman have fulfilled, so, rest of them have to change their subject or their university which is a taxing task for a student. In this case, it will be a force to a students and he or she might loss his education.
On the other hand, taking equal number of seats will ensure the rights of all students. In some university there have some raging system which is based on gender. If the male students is majority, the female stay at a risk. However, if the number of student is equal there is no chance of being ragged.
In conclusion, though having equal percent of students in each subject have the plus point of staying safe, it will be a forced to students weather going to another university or subjects, and can bear some loss in the university fund.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or a student. In this case, it will be a force to a students and he or she might ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61153846154 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45899808817 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8918426792 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6428571429 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230726459503 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978306622306 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589186964843 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18344302501 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526849116815 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.