Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
University is the entrance of the journey towards higher study so it is expected to have the most brilliant students in the university level. The issue stated that universities should select equal number of boy and girl students in every subject to make a balance co-education in university level. In my opinion, this strategy for selecting students is a horrible idea and I almost disagree to this statement with few facts beside.
First of all, University is the education institute where much more brainstorming is needed comparatively with schools and colleges and there is no evidence for correlating intelligence and gender. So if a university bound to obey the rule that they have to balance the genders then some of the brilliant and deserving students may got eliminated in that process which is clearly not good for a student. In addition, some of the weak and non-deserving students may got chance with the advantage of the poor quota rule. In that case, they may fail in future and that will affect the reputation of the university as well as a great financial loss also. As an illustration, suppose a university has an opening for a department of 30 students only and 100 students applied for that position, among them 15 are female only. In that case, university has to take all those 15 female students without having the chance of evaluate them properly and some of the most deserving candidates may got ejected from the selection process for the ridiculous quota rule and without any hesitation it can be clearly said that the university as well as the non-deserving female students and deserving male students will suffer in future.
Secondly, if this the case, then the students who really deserve the subject in that position may got demotivated and can give up on higher study and that will also be a great loss to the university. Unlike schools and colleges, students of university play a major role in maintaining a reputation of the institute and these kind of loss will surely be a great bad impact on value of the university. For instance, if a quite brilliant and well deserved student got rejected and gave up on study, in that case the society and country will lose a valuable gem for the bad selection process.
On contrast, There are some good points for selecting this kind of admission process specially in the case of third world country because in these countries, people of female gender group hardly get a chance for a higher study. In that kind of situation, this type of selection process may motivate a greater portion of female students which may reduce the gender discrimination in those countries but quota for half of the capacity can not be agreeable at all.
In conclusion, balancing male and female in some subject of a university may bring a good effect of studies but this can not be strict without judging each and every student properly. I think students should judged by their merit, and not by their genders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t they have to balance the genders then some of the brilliant and deserving students may go...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ly not good for a student. In addition, some of the weak and non-deserving students may got...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...rsity as well as a great financial loss also. As an illustration, suppose a universi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1208, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...and deserving male students will suffer in future. Secondly, if this the case, the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ining a reputation of the institute and these kind of loss will surely be a great bad impa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, third, well, as to, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2477.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 509.0 315.596192385 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86640471513 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73372803652 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442043222004 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.9 506.74238477 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3522485216 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.8125 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8125 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214953761024 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866660400334 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070285591995 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142612575618 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780380431954 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.