Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
I do not agree with the idea that Universities should admit same number of girls and boys in every class. Such practices are not only unrealistic and impossible to carry out, but they go also against the basic concept of fairness and equality.
First of all, students should have a right to choose what they would like to study and Universities cannot be expected to put a fetter on such rights of students. In a practical world, people have their own preferences about their future study. For example, in India, many girls would like to study Nursing but this subject is the least preferred among male students. If a University attempts to make a class with equal number of students from both the genders, it will have to deny admission to some of the deserving candidates. I believe that such selection procedure would invite unintended consequences such depression among prospective students.
Secondly, it is unfair for anyone to deny admission in a class based on candidate’s gender. It goes against the principle of equality and discrimination. By doing so, a student may be forced to change his subject. As a result, there is likelihood that many young people are denied education arbitrarily.
Finally, it is morally unacceptable that Universities which teach the principles of fairness and justice should resort to such measures in the matter of admission process. Such practices would lay the wrong foundation in academic sector.
In conclusion, there are number of reasons why I would not agree with the admission process solely based on gender. Being a strong defender of fairness, I would think that academic merit is the only right way to admit students in University.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ders, it will have to deny admission to some of the deserving candidates. I believe that su...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85978449309 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564285714286 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3599899447 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20577369978 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648702933178 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734165704951 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105921948271 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041751026154 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.