Higher education should be free of charge and supported by the governments for all citizens. In my opinion, if universities were out of charge and governments supported them financially, this would lead to a high level society and high quality of life.
I think the most obvious reason is that everybody has right to use higher education facilities to improve their skills and follow their goals and dreams in the lifetime. For example students from middle class or low class families should have higher educational opportunities as well as high class ones. If students do not have to pay tuition fees, they will not have to inter in job market earlier. This means that they will inter in the right work place at the right time. Because of the university’s cost most of the students have to get a part-time job or in some cases they unwillingly postponed their education goals.
Furthermore, level of life in the society will rise by supporting universities financially. In a matter of fact, free education will ensure that the workforce is at the required level of skills. Thus specialization and innovations in work places will increase. on the other hand, the paths of development will decrease in the society. Moreover, in terms of higher standard of works, the governments will take the money back through development and high standard life.
To sum up, In order to qualified students do not lose their opportunities of making their proficiency better and getting well-paid careers, higher education should be free for everyone and universities should be places to produce professional experts from all levels of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evel society and high quality of life. I think the most obvious reason is that ...
^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rce is at the required level of skills. Thus specialization and innovations in work ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, i think, as well as, in my opinion, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0946969697 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92231595752 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9548403009 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200741148068 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729013418078 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058782028129 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127175210892 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449413036161 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.