It is considered by many that university students should be enticed to deal with other disciplines apart from their core specialization. I strongly agree with this point of view, as I believe that focusing one area and obtaining knowledge only related to this field of study will not pave a way for students to comprehensively understand their disciplines. Additionally, it poses a threat for students to stick on very limited part of their work and face with struggles to have improvements in their career ladders.
First of all, it is undeniable trust that each area of study is linked one another with high correlation. This is because any singular change in one variable leads to fundamental changes in other indicators. For example, a decrease in interest rate. The fact that the Economics deals with, will conduce a higher willingness of consumption in the people, one of the main research areas of Sociology. Therefore, it is true that without the fundamental knowledge of Economics, sociologists would never make any accurate and timely predictions of change in the behaviours of society.
Secondly, apart from technical knowledge, soft skills are inevitably crucial for career growth. The main reason behind the failure in which employees can not subordinate the tasks is due to the lack of ability to see the big picture. For example, based on statistics published by one of the well-known business magazines, accountants in most companies can’t go beyond the position of chief accountant owing to their straightforward thinking habits.
To sum up, to overwhelm the complexity of modern world that demands finding the correlation between patterns and to open new horizons in their future professional life, students ought to learn a variety of subjects.
- University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that children should learn how to compete but others think that children should be taught to corporate co become more useful adults. Express some reasons to give your own opinion. 61
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, first of all, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2676056338 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05608650877 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62323943662 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4132214178 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171910063397 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539207269514 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558502439298 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933391324397 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744402867496 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.