The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems.What are these problem? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?
With the help of historical inventories, we can enhance our standard of living. Especially car is an essential part of lives. It offers flexibility of life and work and maintain our recreational demand. Having additional car, however, cause a variety of dangerous problems that need to be eliminated and solved absolutely.
The problems associated with frequent car use are becoming more familiar to the general public. The widespread use of car has real environmental cost. It contributes directly to pollute the air by gas emission from vehicles. Moreover, increasing use of fossil fuel like gas or petrol will lead to the rapid exhaustion of the earth’s natural resources. Traffic jam is another problem. As more and more people drive to work rather than walk, cycle or take public transport, there are traffic jams every day at rush hour, which not only prevent us from working on time but also affect human health.
To solve these problems, some people suggest that the government should raise tax for buying additional car, but most of car companies have protested to avoid the decline of their proceed. So I think the better solution would be for car manufactures to design a new kind of car used solar energy instead of traditional material. In the other hand, government should encourage people to use means of public transportation such as bus, train or subway to reduce traffic jams.
In conclusion, I think that while discouraging car use might seem effective to solve these problem immediately, it is not unlikely to be a permanent cure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...r use are becoming more familiar to the general public. The widespread use of car has real env...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...g car use might seem effective to solve these problem immediately, it is not unlikely to be a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0503875969 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83725430981 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670542635659 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1350776976 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357134265986 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105947277107 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774453733075 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197073694206 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680653830548 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.