Some people subscribe to the belief that the conventional way of communication has undergone a tremendous change, whereby replacing with social media. While there seem to be positive developments involved, various negative implications stem from this too which outweigh positive ones.
To commence with, the high contingency reason based on a positive development is the issue of the ubiquity of social media facilitating communication, especially for those residing in far-flung areas. Simply put, social media allows people to keep in touch with their family and friend at ease while geographical borders are not insurmountable barriers anymore. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by expatriates who contact their family members that they are able to keep grounded to their root and emotional intimacy. Another conceivable major positive effect is dwindling the unemployment rate due to creating new job opportunities as we can see in the online stores. In such situations, the argument goes that it is bound to promote career prospects, hopefully leading to ameliorating the issue of joblessness. It in turn might improve people's quality of life as well as life satisfaction.
Turning to the drawbacks of the development, it appears likely that communicating via social media has a profoundly deleterious effect on people's interpersonal skills, thereby impinging on their communicative ability. The more individuals immerse on social media, the less their communication capabilities develop, meaning yielding social interaction impairments and losing an ample of opportunities. For example, if one participates in a job interview via social media, it is highly likely that job seeker will miss putting a positive first good impression to employers and not seize the job opportunity. Furthermore, people may addict to social media and get themselves lost in a visual world. This in itself plays a key role in cutting people off society, leading to social ostracism.
To conclude, while acknowledging the substantial role of social media in making better the communication and job problems, it appears to be problematic not only in making social interactions but also being obsessed with it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54572271386 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23273419752 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607669616519 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4591653496 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.285714286 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159259973828 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556707285627 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322125942556 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101327800147 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320207060731 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.