Watching a live performance such as a play, concert, or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Entertainment in this day and age can not only be enjoyed live on the spot but also through the screen. While many people are pleasant to watch concerts, sporting events at home, I completely side with the opinion of watching live performances for unique experiences it brings about.
On the one hand, the main obstacle which prevents people from attending live performances would be the high costs they have to spend, whereas broadcasted shows cost almost nothing but a TV set. To begin with, entrance tickets to live events can be expensive, and sometimes, sold out in a short time. Take Coachella, a popular music festival, as an example; in 2020, the most affordable ticket costed no less than $500, and the tickets of all tiers had been sold in about one hour. Moreover, if the event is not held at the place where people are living, they have to spend more money including travelling and accommodation fee. In other words, watching shows at home helps viewers save money and also time for travelling.
However, I would argue that it is worth attending at least a live performance in our lives. First of all, there are more activities to do at outdoor events rather than just watching and listening. Owing to the lively music and atmosphere, audiences can truly immerse in the songs, dances, cheers, applause. They can also interact with people on stage or even have the chance to perform along the singers, dancers. Furthermore, going to live events is beneficial for our social life. People who attend the same shows would have similar interest and hobbies, that means they can freely talk about the show itself or why they get into this interest, and also enjoy the performances together. For example, in football matches, the supporters of a club often chant their club’s traditional song collectively, and cheer whenever a goal is scored. In this way, live performances can help enhance mutual understanding and create many memorable experiences.
In conclusion, while being audiences at home may be comfortable and economical, it can not compare with live performances in terms of unique experiences that only people who attend can understand.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97783933518 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71522692241 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592797783934 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9781921444 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3125 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23181609323 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082790918141 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652032053184 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155947817986 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750296453262 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.