Water is a natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the water is the gift form the earth as a nature resource, so some may argue the bottled water should be free to us. For my part, I disagree with this view because I believe the water we could buy in the supermarket is not the natural water anymore.
Certainly, the water resources we see such as river, lake or sea is a natural resource, and people have the ownership of that equally since it does not belong to anyone. Even governments do not have the right to allocate the water resources or charge money for the river water or lake water. For instance, the uses of river water are common for the people who live along with a river, which has been used to wash clothes, cook, or other household daily uses.
However, the bottled water is not just one kind of natural resources because it is produced by a series of manufacturing steps, including collecting, cleaning, filtering, packaging and so forth, as the water we buy in the stores is a matured good instead of a raw resource. The price we paid for a bottle of water contains the cost from not only the transport fee of water, but also the money for treatment and package. For example, the bottled water in China sold in a range of prices which depends on the extent to the cleaning process and the package design. Consumers are more likely to purchase the water contains fewer harmful materials and packaged in a beautiful and clean bottle.
In conclusion, the bottled water is not a type of natural stuff, and I therefore disagree with the idea that banning the sale of bottled water.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
It is true that the water is the gift form the earth as a nature resource, so some...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50704225352 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42270921419 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531690140845 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1136557425 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388143272853 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170824931968 0.084324248473 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982778948191 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264272137041 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716746011328 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.