Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that refugees should be approved more by wealthy states and provided with the initial support to settle sustainably in new countries. This essay totally agrees with this statement because only rich nations could have enough financial ability to accept a larger number of these people and this is also a great solution for these states to increase their population to solve their labor shortage.
Developed countries usually have a surplus in their financial balance which can be used to admit more people who have fled from their original hometowns because of the civil wars. This is because that these nations will have to spend a huge amount of money to aid displaced people to resettle successfully in new lands. For example, the Canada government reported that they spent 25 million dollars in 2015 to welcome 25,000 Syrian refugees to come to Canada. All of them were provided not only air tickets to Canada but also the primary accommodation for the first 2 years such as housing, meals, and education.
Another reason why rich states should accept more refugees is that they also can be beneficial from this humanitarian aid. Developed nations normally are facing the aging population, leading to the lack of labor forces, so if they receive more immigrants including refugees, this problem can be solved quickly. Most refugees are young people who could contribute their talents and hard works to their new residential states. For example, Japan, Canada, and Germany have coped with the severe lack of labor in the agriculture and manufacturing industry. By receiving a massive of refugees from Syria recently, they could reduce the high demand for labor in these sectors.
In conclusion, the number of approved refugees in wealthy states should be increased because only these nations have the ability to do that and this also helps them to tackle the issue of the labor shortage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09841269841 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49932215552 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526984126984 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.7798462845 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165263021233 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067343980299 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585486337193 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114116167329 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254335729536 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.