As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do
you agree or disagree?
Businesses have always sought to make a profit, but it is becoming increasingly common to
hear people talk about the social obligations that companies have. I completely agree with the
idea that businesses should do more for society than simply make money.
On the one hand, I accept that businesses must make money in order to survive in a
competitive world. It seems logical that the priority of any company should be to cover its
running costs, such as employees’ wages and payments for buildings and utilities. On top of
these costs, companies also need to invest in improvements and innovations if they wish to
remain successful. If a company is unable to pay its bills or meet the changing needs of
customers, any concerns about social responsibilities become irrelevant. In other words, a
company can only make a positive contribution to society if it is in good financial health.
On the other hand, companies should not be run with the sole aim of maximizing profit; they
have a wider role to play in society. One social obligation that owners and managers have is
to treat their employees well, rather than exploiting them. For example, they could pay a
“living wage” to ensure that workers have a good quality of life. I also like the idea that
businesses could use a proportion of their profits to support local charities, environmental
projects or education initiatives. Finally, instead of trying to minimize their tax payments by
using accounting loopholes, I believe that company bosses should be happy to contribute to
society through the tax system.
In conclusion, I believe that companies should place as much importance on their social
responsibilities as they do on their financial objectives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 89, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...iting them. For example, they could pay a 'living wage' to ensure that...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21754385965 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02089980664 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6810200907 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.384615385 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.38176352705 456% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19091234605 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723750592752 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628819646955 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0552408938972 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597079354079 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.