There seems a fact that nowadays, employees are unable to stay in a lifetime occupation or a stable working environment due to the swift changes in the job market and the workplace. This essay will discuss several reasons for this tendency before providing people with a few strategies to adapt to those imminent changes.
Among numerous causes jointly fuel the dynamic movement in the world of work, two fundamental factors may be taken into account. Firstly, the workforce’s quality is becoming higher since tertiary education is now more affordable and advanced. Equipped with the latest knowledge and vital soft skills, employees in a given generation can gain a competitive edge over their older colleagues, regardless of the seniority discrepancy in a profession. Secondly, it is the incredible development of the technology which re-establishes the needs of the job market and revolutionize the working style. Driverless cars, products of artificial intelligence, are cases in point, whereby in the upcoming future, a large number of taxi drivers are to be rendered obsolete. In another word, those who have not been ready to adapt to those progressions are most likely to be unemployed.
However, multiple ways can be proposed to deal with that situation. For instance, high school students should be helped in deciding which occupation they would pursue, in order not to choose a job that will be computerised in the future, likewise taxi drivers mentioned above. For those whose a job or who embarking on their career, it is necessary to continuously develop and exercise a wide range of soft skills, as they can apply them in the current position as well as in the other working environments. Last but not least, workers should pay attention to technology progressions and consider integrating them into aspects of the work. Remote working, a fashionable style of working which bases on the internet, for example, allows people to manage their time effectively and therefore, their work would presumably more productive.
In conclusion, the uninterrupted progression of the technology and the increasingly skilled workers are deemed as the impulse of the ever dynamics in the job market. Employees, therefore, should be proactive in career orienting and equip themselves with new skills and technologies.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... point, whereby in the upcoming future, a large number of taxi drivers are to be rendered obsolet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
...taxi drivers mentioned above. For those whose a job or who embarking on their career,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32336956522 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02610408658 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9071348638 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235976946506 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681410723846 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446691918972 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124661685799 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587133472307 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... point, whereby in the upcoming future, a large number of taxi drivers are to be rendered obsolet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
...taxi drivers mentioned above. For those whose a job or who embarking on their career,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32336956522 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02610408658 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9071348638 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235976946506 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681410723846 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446691918972 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124661685799 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587133472307 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.