The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, some have expressed support for a single united government to reign over humanity, replacing the idea of each country owning a respective national government. As lofty as it may sound, whether the benefits outweigh the drawbacks will only be transparent after analysis.
United under a one-world government has various advantages, especially the unification of systems that people encounter in everyday lives. This means consistent units of measurement, as there would be no need to translate miles to kilometers or pounds to kilograms. As a result, life would be much more convenient. Similarly, a single currency utilized widely would speed up every transaction. Moreover, establishing a one-world government would render national boundaries obsolete, and the resulting freedom of transit would free mankind from physical distance. Flying to exotic holiday spots weekly, for instance, would become far more feasible. Hence, the benefits of a unified world-state will be greater.
However, this scenario may have more negatives than anticipated. It is worth noting that as the notion of states fades, so will the need for foreign threat protection. Consequently, the military would be deployed to police the world's large population, risking human liberty to maintain peace. Furthermore, one government cannot physically expand, which means distant lands may disapprove of its decisions. Conflicts will inevitably develop, mostly given humanity's cultural and historical diversity, and addressing them at their base would necessitate oppressive measures. In the end, the advantages of a world state would come at the price of more basic issues.
To summarize, having a single ruling authority would do more harm than good. People should be controlled by themselves, or at least by those physically and culturally nearby. Supporting a worldwide state would be a dishonest trade-off of human autonomy for comfort.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, at least, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64137931034 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.983139302 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662068965517 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6903694172 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237897079396 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655639489606 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601985505258 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146692744886 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486437394894 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.