You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the
governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or
disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your
own knowledge and experience.
As the world approaches the Information Age, the scientific investigation is better than any other time. Some individuals insist that scientific exploration should be regulated bu authority instead of private companies. I support this view completely, because the government can also provide ethical and regulatory framework for conducting research.
Transparently, government, controlling scientific research, benefit the development of science because it can provide sufficient financial budget. As evidence of this, the Apollo program is a milestone in human beings' history, for mankind can perform space traveling to the moon. However, during the period of twelve years, this program spend nearly 107 billion the US dollar, so companies cannot bear the huge expense undoubtedly. Based on this fact, were the government not for the incharge of this program, people would never embark on the moon. Therefore, authorities are more likely to play important part in human beings' scientific research.
Furthermore, the authority taking part in scientific research can guarantee scientific activities in the ethical framework because the authority can institute some law to prevent unethical research. For example, genetic technology is not mature, and thus no one can control its experimental result, especially on human beings. To prevent uncertain disaster, the government can cease unethical research.
However, private companies endure the competitive race, so they prefer continuing to explore new technology or novel products. But, in fact, many companies are not patient to promote the scientific revolution or provide fragment research outcomes. By contrast, authority can offer excellent conditions to scientific workers.
To recapitulate, I support government to take part in scientific activities as they can provide financial support and censor the moral standard of science, so it is beneficial to mankind's development of science. In general, private companies can offer limited scientific contribution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
... Apollo program is a milestone in human beings history, for mankind can perform space ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9180887372 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07613252218 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580204778157 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9287469309 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156929464526 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583098074431 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320124914131 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940377580008 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506577953084 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.