Young generation nowadays knows more about pop celebrities as compared to important figures of history.
why is this?
what can be done to make young people learn more about their past?
A large proportion of youngsters keenly follows celebrities on the mainstream media and is less interested in important historical figures. This situation is a result of increased exposure to media and short comings of the education system. There are a number of effective steps that can be taken to divert young minds into learning about their past.
One major problem that accounts for the celebrity influence on young minds is the excessive interaction children have with the entertainment industry from a very young age. Parents often prefer letting children watch television for hours, this ensures that children remain busy and don't disturb them. As a result of this common upbringing method we often witness toddlers imitating cartoon characters that they frequently watch, this liking frequently develops into obsession and is portrayed by children wanting their entire surrounding pasted with pictures of their favorite character. In addition to being a strong influence tv watching is ought to develop into an addictive habit and young adults often confess of binge watching shows overnight. Moreover, schools play a significant role in developing a child's interests The current education system focusses more on science and related subjects rather than history and philosophy, even if history is taught at school it is not made interesting and often referred to as a dry subject by most students. The idea of history not being as important as other subjects influences the young minds and they ultimately resort to not taking any interest in the subject on the long run.
There are a number of measures that can be implemented to effectivelt alter the dynamics of children's thought process. One effective solution is improving the history teaching methods. this could include school visits at cultural emneties such as museums and theaters where children can benefit from a wholesome learning experience. in additiuon tp making the learning process fun, we can counsel parents to avoid early exposure to t.v shows and other sources of media and encourage them to read history books to their children from an early age. This would develop a appositive reading habit and consequently influence the young minds to learn more about the people they frequently read.
In conclusion, making history an interesting subject to learn and altering the conventional brought up methods can effectively make youngsters more inquisitive about their past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s ensures that children remain busy and dont disturb them. As a result of this commo...
^^^^
Line 6, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...improving the history teaching methods. this could include school visits at cultural...
^^^^
Line 6, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...t from a wholesome learning experience. in additiuon tp making the learning proces...
^^
Line 6, column 567, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n from an early age. This would develop a appositive reading habit and consequent...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39793281654 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75482979407 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552971576227 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.8704488081 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.266666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26831338068 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932426436532 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818753528326 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192657563024 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379747243221 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.