16.10.2017
Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company, while others think that employees should be involved in the decision-making process too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many aver decision-making ought to be done solely by management; while others claim involving workers in the process could be advantageous as well. Below both prospects will be discussed in details and author’s opinion will be given.
On the one hand, analysis of information and the process of making a decision must be fulfilled by professionals. Firstly, managers acquire appropriate education in finances, economics and have skills of working with data that were forged while studying at University. Thus, those highly prepared and well-read individuals should be responsible for making difficult and challenging decisions. Secondly, those who work in the management positions have access to firm’s secrets and closed information that, by definition, is not available to outsiders due to dangerous consequences of handling the sensitive papers into wrong hands. So, only managers possess sufficient information to make right decisions. Those are a couple of facts that buttress the first point of view.
On the other hand, a participation of employees in decision-making could bring some fruits. Primarily, workers that feel control over company’s policy are more motivated to work harder and more productive than those who are separated from the crucial process. A sociological research carried out in the UK in the 1980s showcased employees' productivity may skyrocket up to 146 percent if the staff have a word in making decisions. Furthermore, some resolutions may be concerned the manufacturing process about which CEO and other managers likely have a vague understanding. Allowing personnel to speak up their opinions about such issues will probably make the decisions more efficient and thoughtful. Those are several benefits of employees’ participating in shaping company’s choices.
In my opinion, the majority of strategical decisions must be done by a management group that has all needed data and knacks to foresee the future turns in development of markets. However, including personnel in making decisions about work process can encourage the staff to work more vigorously and increase business effectiveness.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
have skills of working with data that were forged while studying at University.
have skills of working with data forged while studying at University.
workers that feel control over company’s policy
workers who feel control over company’s policy
in development of markets.
in the development of markets.
in developing/developed markets.
---------------------
flaws:
Auxiliary verbs are over used:
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178%
like: may, could, would, ought, ...
it means other verbs are not used enough.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 324 350
No. of Characters: 1769 1500
No. of Different Words: 194 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.243 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.46 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.058 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 135 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 67 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.189 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.507 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.017 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65546218487 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2118825042 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585434173669 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2086254935 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465079708202 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144073847484 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162944663051 0.0667982634062 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324776947294 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.287938613166 0.056905535591 506% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.