All around the globe every year many animal species become extinct. However, some people feel that governments should be concerned more with solving the problems of human life. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Habitant loss can be enormous ways such as, environmental calamities, pollution, drought, deforestation and many others; however, in this circumstance various species are being eliminated from globe. Further to this, humans argue that government need to consider the challenges faced by human life because they are being affected by these calamities.
Firstly, there are plethora of species in this massive arena fighting to safeguard their survival. Due the rapid growth of population there is undoubted increase in pollution as well; moreover, to maintain their existence on earth humans are attempting to deforestation. By this unlawful act many endangered and rare species are vanished. On the other hand, pollution plays a vital role in tuning environment to become more toxic. In addition, aquatic mammals are becoming extinct due to the release of industrial waste into rivers.
Humans are part of great cycle of life on earth, and as such we depend on overall systems for our survival. On the contrary, human life is in perilous situation despite of calamities like earthquakes, floods, drought; additionally, there is a huge loss of infrastructure and resources. To reform the structure to its original state and to continue the human existence it requires lot of support from government. Due to the unnecessary usage of resources with massive increase in population, many natural resources are being abolished which needs to be controlled.
As, globe is a humongous mass which constitute both animals and humans without them there is no existence of earth. Government need to be concerned at whole ecosystem; but, human’s life needs more importance because human existence can help in animal’s survival and longevity. On a whole, the management should help in solving the challenges faced by human life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...pecies are being eliminated from globe. Further to this, humans argue that government n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43859649123 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00745764349 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9495356395 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255677959258 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799560845705 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434135011344 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14794350691 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476255273552 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.