All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them.

Do you agree or disagree?

With advancements in technology and progression in aspects of innovation and modernization, it is generally argued that the use of electric automobiles ought to be a substitute for the fuel powered vehicles, and that these cars with hydrocarboned energy source should be completely discouraged and taken out of existence. I do, however, completely disagree to this argument because electric powered vehicles are very expensive and requires constant electric supply to keep them running, which I believe is not sustainable in many developing and under developed countries across the globe.

Firstly, there is a good deal of evidence that these cars with renewable energy source like electricity are exorbitantly high probably because of the technicality and complexity required in manufacturing them. In other words, purchasing electric cars may become difficult for most of the global audience living in poorer countries, making it difficult to commute from one place to the other, especially for those that travel a far distance to earn a living. Consequently, consistent punctuality in the workplace may become a major challenge for many people, and ultimately causing their career to suffer.
For instance, in 2013, the UK government published a report about consumer’s behaviour and reactions to the production and sales of electric vehicles within the country, and the conclusion of the report was that over 75% of the average population could not afford acquiring an electric car due to its increased cost. This has made most of them settle for the fuel powered ones, which they considered more affordable.

Secondly, electric cars
require continuous electricity for effective management. That is to say, most economies, such as in the developing and under developed countries, that lack constant power supply will definitely find it challenging to embrace this innovation, and that would become an extra national responsibility and concern, taking into consideration that there are many other economical challenges to be overcome. This development would not be healthy for countries that struggle to maintain stability, and may lead to some adverse ramifications if electric cars are made mandatory.
Nigeria, for example, has been facing many social responsibilities for a number of decades now, including inadequate power supply, and replacing fuel cars for electric vehicles is almost not feasible.

To conclude, I reiterate my point by stating that banning vehicles using petrol source completely for electric cars should not be encouraged, as the average populace and many economies all over the world may suffer greatly due to its high price and demanding power respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to acquire'.
Suggestion: to acquire
...the average population could not afford acquiring an electric car due to its increased co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e affordable. Secondly, electric cars require continuous electricity for effec...
^^^
Line 8, column 215, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'embracing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: embracing
...ply will definitely find it challenging to embrace this innovation, and that would become ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53623188406 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06272573398 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.2546295009 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.0 106.682146367 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 20.7667163134 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254950412386 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993035270222 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567363449127 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148810213449 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614040384351 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 13.0946893788 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.05 50.2224549098 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to acquire'.
Suggestion: to acquire
...the average population could not afford acquiring an electric car due to its increased co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e affordable. Secondly, electric cars require continuous electricity for effec...
^^^
Line 8, column 215, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'embracing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: embracing
...ply will definitely find it challenging to embrace this innovation, and that would become ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53623188406 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06272573398 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.2546295009 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.0 106.682146367 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 20.7667163134 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254950412386 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993035270222 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567363449127 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148810213449 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614040384351 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 13.0946893788 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.05 50.2224549098 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.