All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
Cars that have been used in the past decades are mainly dependent on gas or fuel. Although electric cars have been invented recently, the percentage of using them is still at a low rate. As a matter of fact, I agree with the replacement of all fuel cars with electrical ones. The reasons for that could vary, however, the main two reasons, in my opinion, are climate change and animal extinction.
Climate change has been a rising issue that is encountered in any environmental and even economical event. One of the major reasons that caused climate change is the pollution caused by gas burning. In the past 50 years, the rate of land, air, and water pollution has been increased exponentially. As a result, some of the glacial layers in the north or south pole have disappeared which caused the temperature to increase and increase the flood rate. Therefore, fossil cars could affect climate change even worse and this could be a standalone reason why they should be banned.
Animal extinction is also one of the consequences of pollution caused by fuel consumption. Although there are vast efforts all over the world to save endangered animals, the rate of extinction has been increased tremendously. Moreover, the animal species are facing different challenges including habitat loss and death especially marine animals that have been affected more because of water pollution. In order to maintain and save our planet, animals should be saved and protected from the impact of fuel burning.
In conclusion, fossil cars have a huge effect on the environment and as a result, this affects the climate and the animal species. In my opinion, electric cars could be a brilliant replacement for fossil cars and could save the earth to be a healthier plane
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n increased exponentially. As a result, some of the glacial layers in the north or south po...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cts the climate and the animal species. In my opinion, electric cars could be a br...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97966101695 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71133469403 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51186440678 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2947073955 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25303187047 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857402715018 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948630865785 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164662181171 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801913772078 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.