All over the world, people watch foreign films much more than locally produced films. Why? Should the government provide financial
support to local film industries?
Foreign films such as Hollywood blockbusters are released all over the world and enjoyed more than locally produced films. This essay intends to explain the reasons behind the phenomenon and also discuss whether the government should provide financial support to these local film industry.
The primary reason for the urge towards watching a foreign film is that they are using the most modern technology. For instance, the visual effects and acoustics of the movie Avatar won the global audience. What is more, these kinds of movies are produced by giant companies that have the money and means to generate huge publicity for them. Today, we all know that marketing is what decides the fate of the product- be film, gadget or whatever. In contrast, locally produced films are produced by small production houses and on top of that, they have a familiar storyline that may not interest some people. That probably explains why most people watch foreign films rather than locally produced ones.
Another significant reason for watching foreign films is that people are curious to know about foreign culture and lifestyle. Today, we do not belong to a big planet Earth; we belong to a global village. So, people are exposed to different cultures and watching foreign movies to satiates their curiosity of knowing about them. Now, it’s the era of web-series, a lot of people are watching these foreign web-series in order to have a deeper insight into the foreign language, as this is the best way to learn a language.
I firmly believe that the government should invest in the local film industry. To begin with, films reflects the countries culture. Supporting these local film industries enables to spread its culture to the world and is an essential approach to showcase the power of the nation. Secondly, the boom of this industry would, to a large extent, produce an increasing number of job positions and consequently, the unemployment rate will substantially decrease, which will contribute to the economy.
To recapitulate, people are watching foreign films because of their better technology and to satisfy the curiosity of foreign culture. The government should promote the local film industry for spreading our culture and for boosting the economy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in contrast, such as, to begin with, what is more, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15489130435 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59859770012 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529891304348 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2710339182 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.388888889 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548997955615 0.244688304435 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173174211617 0.084324248473 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122853730177 0.0667982634062 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32148100761 0.151304729494 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109604362458 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.