ln recent years the family has changed as well as family roles. Why is this happening and is this situation positive or negative?
Changes are inevitable in nature and with changing times the family’s inner construction, along with the position of its members, has also changed. This essay intends to analyse the reasons for this trend. Personally, I, believe that the situation has both advantages and disadvantages.
Firstly, globalisation has contributed significantly to change in the trend of social structure and reformed family roles. The exposure to foreign cultures has changed the people’s mindset, and also redefined the role of women in the family. Women are no longer limited to household chores and are working shoulder to shoulder with men. The reins of the household are no longer in the hands of the man, the bread-earner, of the family.
The second major reason for this change in the fabric of the family is the economic condition. Since it is challenging to maintain a family with many members and to make ends meet, it is more feasible to keep the size of the family small. Thus, according to a recent study, the nuclear family has risen in popularity in the last two decades.
The modification in the family structure and roles has brought about many benefits. Firstly, it has led to an egalitarian society, where gender differences are disappearing, and woman can also fulfil their dreams and ambition. The society has also benefited from a greater labour force.
On the other side, the bonds between family members are being weakened. Since most parents have to spend time working, their children are left unattended or sent to daycare centres. The shrinkage in family size also results in more elders being sent to old-age home instead of staying with their children and grandchildren.
To recapitulate, culture and economic changes contribute to the change in family structure and responsibilities among the members. While this trend positively contributes to gender equality and strengthens the labour force, it has also detrimental effects on family relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maintaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: maintaining
...omic condition. Since it is challenging to maintain a family with many members and to make ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, so, then, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24367088608 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90548899283 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.781560705 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0555555556 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307156389376 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922833155222 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708717377935 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160520973876 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864875036854 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.