Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more
privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The expansion of media has adverse impacts on the privacy of renowned personalities. Some people assert that interference of media into the lives of celebrities should be minimized whereas others opine that it is the cost paid for their achieved stardom. In my opinion, famous people also have the right to hold privacy in order to enjoy happily with family and friends and to provide independent life to their children.
On the other hand, the people holding the tag of stardom are also human beings, just like any other ordinary people. Therefore, they also have the freedom to enjoy with their family and friends, without being highlighted on television screens. The exaggeration of media invasion in their personal lives sometimes leads to serious repercussions. To exemplify, the famous actor Hritik Roshan got divorced due to invalid facts published on newspapers and televisions channels. Moreover, the lives of the family members also get disturbed due to the interference of media, as a result, most of the celebrities send their children to abroad for their studies.
On the other hand, celebrities are being adored and followed by ordinary people and they always try to imitate their lifestyles. Therefore, considering this factor the media focuses on daily activities of television starts in order to earn more popularity for their channels. Additionally, to maintain their fame among the audience, famous people usually allow the paparazzi to interfere in their personal lives. For instance, Bollywood stars post
their every minute activity on social media which gets viral by other media sources to multiple
channels.
In conclusion, according to my viewpoint, people with stardom should be given their freedom to enjoy their personal life and media intervention should be limited to their work-lives. In the near future, there will definitely
become the need to restrict the interference of media into the personal lives of celebrities to avoid any adverse effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...viral by other media sources to multiple channels. In conclusion, according to...
^^^
Line 9, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the near future, there will definitely become the need to restrict the interfer...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35668789809 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77262543875 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525477707006 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4820924764 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323452969935 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119382751459 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758265421827 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179120057466 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758720699714 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.