Because of technological advances, the number of smart devices with numerous features at affordable prices has been increased, allowing human beings to either work or study from home with ease. From my preference, despite the problem of distraction, this development is overall positive for individuals.
On the one hand, according to opponents of this trend, the primary drawback of the work-from-home trend is distractions. This is because people who work or study from home can effortlessly access the Internet for entertainment during the working period. As a result, their final performance can see a dramatic drop due to the lack of concentration. For example, because the Delta variant of Covid-19 is getting more complicated in recent weeks, Vietnamese students must study from home through video communications applications like Zoom to prepare for the graduation exam. However, many students had trouble staying focused on the streaming courses presented by their teachers due to insufficient pressure they always had at school, leading to the increased number of poor performances in the actual exam.
On the other hand, I believe positive consequences this development induces must be highlighted. The first benefit is mitigating air pollution. Because the main culprit of this pollution stems from carbon emissions made by private means of transportation operated to go to the workplace, massive amounts of exhaust gases can be cut when it comes to working and studying at home. Secondly, studying from home provides students with incredible chances to replay the recorded streaming courses for reviewing in an effort to avoid missing important details. As a result, the popularity of smart devices loaded with modern features at lower prices allows individuals to work with each other remotely with ease, which helps reduce tremendous amounts of carbon emissions causing the contaminated air and enhance self-study to students.
In conclusion, I believe this development is positive to some extent despite the primary drawback mentioned above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52215189873 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02886787736 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4917132355 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.230769231 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222749694645 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778611527335 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587684076718 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129167740044 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524636029331 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.