Technology is a controversial topic that usually causes many conflicting opinions. From my perspective, I believe that the activity of working and studying from home occurred by the reasonable price and easy-accessing of high technology both bring up benefits to people.
The primary reason why technology makes people home-working an optimistic thing is the convenience of its in addressing assignments. It is an undeniable fact that thanks to the development of high-tech, people could have the ability to cope with their tasks and homework much more efficiently and faster, compared with the past's backward, without the unnecessary help from other people. For instance, students used to do their homework depending a lot on teachers and tutors, whilst in the current society, they have multifunctional applications and devices to help them do crucial research and ask for help only when needed. This leads to the pupils' education activity at school is no longer essential and obligatory.
A further examination conveys that technology not only eases the process of the assignment but also maximizes productivity whilst they start to work from home. The phenomenon predicted will have a high chance to be prominent if people cut off wasted time, for traveling as an example, and stay at home. This is a scientific fact since people would work with the best performance when they are at their comfort place, in other words, their home. Consequently, the highest productivity would be gained at the same time with their mental gratify.
In conclusion, many adults and children start working and learning from home as well because of the conveniences gained from technology. I maintain my assumption as this phenomenon is positive for our people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...elp only when needed. This leads to the pupils education activity at school is no long...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31182795699 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0065254502 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5309598332 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288182716666 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102161105226 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791452060898 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195938203372 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694941432164 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.