The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that the mother nature is always necessary to live our life. Some people might think that it is the greatest method to resolve the environmental issues to price up the natural resources such as gasoline internationally. Although the environment of the society is significant, I strongly disagree with the idea. This essay will address the perspective of how the natural resources influence our life.
First of all, the economy of the world is usually affected by the fuels. In other words, the natural resources would be the main factor to operate the economic benefits because the number of people may not earn the money from their workplace. For example, if the cost of the fuels raised up, the majority of industries cannot run their factories and then the rate of unemployment would increase because the budget of companies is resstricted to pay the salary for their employees which means the company cannot afford to give the expensive price for the fuels and their workers. Thus, when the price of the fuels goes up, it may become the serious unemployment in our community.
Morever, it would be affecting to decrease using the transport. All transportations such as cars are required the gas to move. However, when the costs increase, an abundance of people might not take the vehicles properly then it will be the cause to deteriorate the human's lifestyle because many individuals would not enjoy their life such as the leisure time. For instance, when they need to go camping, the vehicles are essential but they are not able to do it due to the high fares of the gasoline. Therefore, using transport may not be taken once the level of fuelling costs increases and it connects people's happiness index.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that the environmental problems are concerned, inclining the cost of resoureces is not the best choice for human's life. We need to encourage people to consume it but they might control to prevent destroying the nature appropriately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...it will be the cause to deteriorate the humans lifestyle because many individuals woul...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94970414201 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75968268732 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53550295858 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8668861709 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133969187803 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389513645372 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460953707055 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777166517055 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317724136334 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.