Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is often argued that friendship is necessary to share some advice for each other. Some people might claim that it is more effective to make friends who have the same ideas, whereas, others say that it is nice to have friends who often do not agree with the group. Although friends with same options are significant, I personally think that mates having the opposite opinions would be much better. This essay will address the both views of friendship and provide the opinion.

First of all, it may affect the mood how they feel. When individuals have a conversation, they might share the feelings each other to make disappear their bad emotion. For example, when people have the worst ideas, they would be being weak. However, when they interact with others who can communicate the same, they might feel happier because the wrong thinking sometimes can be the factor which makes people existing weaknesses. Thus, sharing the same opinions may be the good choice to have friends.

On the other hand, making friends who sometimes do not accept with others might be a good opportunity to grow up. In other words, when individuals admit the criticism of their ideas, they would be more mature to improve their lifestyle. For instance, people can repair their weakness which is the obstacle to decrease the quality of life when they have the friends who disagree because these types of people may suggest an abundance of advice to help. Therefore, having a close friendship that has the opposite ideas may enhance the lifestyle in the future.

In conclusion, in spite of the fact that mates who have same opinions may share the moods, it is more efficient to have friends who have different ideas to improve themselves.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in other words, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89078498294 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39410003716 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494880546075 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7232920037 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383484876293 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141716071274 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099529167101 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272910299318 0.151304729494 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816395346335 0.056905535591 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.