The best way to solve the world's traffic and environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?
It is true that the tackling of traffic problems impacting on the environment has always been a topic of debate. Some people suggest that raising the fuel price is the best solution to cope with environmental issues. From my perspective, I disagree with this notion for reasons outlined.
On the one hand, a sharp rise in petrol price is indeed of the essence. The key rationale in favor of this view is that if the government increased taxes on petrol, in the modern days, people still cannot cut down the tremendous demand for fuel at once. In other words, the problem of traffic jams and pollution would stay unsolved, because people would still travel to work, to school, or to shops on a daily basis, for example. Another compelling interpretation is that petroleum is also used for various purposes in manufacturing and agriculture industries, thus the reluctance of using expensive fuel is more likely to have an acute affect on the national economy.
However, I am convinced that it is far more of a drawback for the citizens, it is absurd to downplay the imperative of raising the fuel cost. When the government adopts policies rising in fuel cost, motorists would restrict the number and length of their journeys to compensate for the extra expense. The national authorities would then use this money to subsidize the cost of fares and to invest in transport infrastructure. Additionally, in terms of freight services, a plethora of goods are able to be transported by rail rather than by struck. As a result, this would relieve many roads from heavy traffic by reducing the number of vehicles, which in return alleviates the problem of pollution caused by exhaust fumes and helps in the effort to combat greenhouse gas.
In conclusion, while advocates believe that heightening the price of fuels would be a useful remedy for the environment, I am convinced that this might be a stopgap measure and some other methods should be adopted instead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 638, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ve fuel is more likely to have an acute affect on the national economy. However, I am c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... transport infrastructure. Additionally, in terms of freight services, a plethora...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92749244713 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79323067826 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583081570997 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8761454937 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135835644691 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477581851954 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300539534949 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085010895391 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360147387208 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.