some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
It is true that the government assistance on transportation infrastructure has been a polarizing topic. While the proponents of this tendency are adamant that the government spending should invest in constructing railroad and subway lines to diminish traffic jams , others assert that this expenditure should be allocated in building more broader roads. In this essay, I will look at the reasoning of both camps before explaining why I side with the former.
On the other hand, the key rationale in favor of this view is that the erecting train and subway lines can decrease traffic jams .It is clear that trains have a plethora of spacious rooms and a handful of seats, which means that they contain a colossal number of passengers and deliver them to a destination in one time. Moreover, trains will run their own rail, hence the waiting for other kinds of transport and stopping at traffic lights is impossible. Another compelling interpretation is that the bulk of these public transport is invariably on time compared to private vehicles. Therefore, the use of these means of transport like trains or subways act as a deterrent at higher risk of traffic congestion in rush hour.
On the other hand, there are several arguments in support of the idea that the construction and extension of roadways are feasible. Firstly, the utilization of individuals’ own vehicles brings greater benefits than trains and subways such as more convenient, faster than and flexible time. Prime example, in Vietnam, motorcycles are the main transport of the vast majority of residents, thus the expanded roads for motorbikes or automobiles can cope with traffic jams due to the huge number of private transports on the rise. Secondly, it is equally important to note that travelers, who use trains and subways, are more likely to get into a flurry of troubles such as jostling in the crowd or even being pickpocketed.
In conclusion, we cannot deny that both sides are well-grounded, but I would contend that the construction of railroads is the optimal method to mitigate traffic congestion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nd subway lines to diminish traffic jams , others assert that this expenditure sho...
^^
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'broader' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: broader
...nditure should be allocated in building more broader roads. In this essay, I will look at th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d subway lines can decrease traffic jams .It is clear that trains have a plethora ...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...subway lines can decrease traffic jams .It is clear that trains have a plethora of...
^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...private vehicles. Therefore, the use of these means of transport like trains or subways act...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11988304094 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92512680408 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576023391813 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2743146062 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.916666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217525643743 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671258462885 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584990596655 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11720625515 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054517150511 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.