the only way to improve the safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offenses. What extent do you agree or disagree?
A school of thought holds that imposing harsh punishments for traffic-related crimes is the sole method to enhance the safe road. From my perspective, I disagree with this notion for the reason outlined. While it is believed that there are a plethora of efficient ways that can improve the safety of our roads.
On the one hand, stringent punishments for driving offenses is indeed of the essence. The key rationale in favor of this view is that penalties for dangerous drivers are able to help road enhancement. There is no point denying that the range of punishments for traffic lawbreakers act as a deterrent to avoid repeating similar crimes. Prime example, these motorists drive without their helmets being fined a certain amount of money from a million to 2 millions dong, this sanction might create a feeling of fear of penalization, leading to more likely to not violate the law. In fact, the vast majority of traffic casualties occur due to drivers not seriously following the traffic rules. Therefore, the punishments stricter for irresponsible drivers are a reasonable way to decrease traffic accidents.
However, I am convinced that it is far better methods for driving offences to improve the safety of our roads. Firstly, The government needs to raise the residentials’ awareness about the dangers of aggressive driving and a flurry of behaviors causing other traffic accidents such as run a red light, drink-driving or hit and run. These actions can be mentioned before issuance of the licence in order for citizens to be fully aware of them and visualize their consequences. Secondly, the authorities and locals can diminish the traffic casualties by investing in transportation infrastructures. It means that the fewer citizens travelling by automobiles, the more ones use public transportation such as buses or trains, hence contributing to safe road maintenance.
In conclusion, while some people believe that enacting stricter punishments for dangerous drivers is the only option to make safer roads. I am convinced that there are several methods that can be better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...th this notion for the reason outlined. While it is believed that there are a plethor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0615786596 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580357142857 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8037593981 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240099632245 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799990872195 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066994697988 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146794017537 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405818402349 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.