Some people think that students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on more important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
It is true that the concern of what subjects that students should focus on has been a polarizing topic. While the proponents of this tendency are adamant that food science and cooking should be added to study programs, others assert that students should utterly concentrate on major subjects. In this essay, I will look at the reason for both camps before explaining why I side with the former.
On the one hand, studying the science of food and cooking are indeed of the essence. The key rationale in favor of this view is that academic subjects such as Math and Literature arm the individual student with the foundation knowledge. What is more imperative than that is that these knowledge act as a precursor to facilitate their career progress down the road. For example, logical thinking acquired during the math lessons as well as critical thinking fostered by the literature lessons are prerequisites to enhance problem-solving skills. Another compelling interpretation is that the timetable of high school students is already crowded by a plethora of extracurricular activities such as art, music and sport, hence complementing scientific subjects is not straightforward.
On the other hand, there are several arguments in support of the idea that studying science of food and how to prepare meals would bring a healthy diet for numerous students. First and foremost, knowledge of these subjects is related to the study of human biology, which means schoolers might comprehend the concepts of building up the immune system as well as human body structures. By the same token, students also possessed a solid understanding of biochemical subjects pertaining to artificial colouring and flavouring, chemical preservative and food labelling. In addition, having a good grasp of food and diet, young people are able to be aware of the value of healthy eating habits and nutrients. Moreover, those who are proficient with culinary skills are more capable of adjusting their dietary pattern which aims at living more healthier by preparing homemade food.
In conclusion, we cannot deny that both sides are well-grounded, but I would contend that science of food subjects and cooking can boost their horizon about foods and keep them fit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...at is more imperative than that is that these knowledge act as a precursor to facilitate their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 834, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...ir dietary pattern which aims at living more healthier by preparing homemade food. In conclus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, what is more, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2243767313 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89894986926 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584487534626 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.921026335 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7857142857 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32231244057 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939704445217 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562426268758 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172514514896 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497772059917 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.